h3.post-title { color:#000000; } h3.post-title a, h3.post-title a:visited { color:#7f0000; } h3.post-title a:hover { color:#00ffff; } .post-title a { color:#A52A2A; } .post-title { color:#A52A2A; } -->

Thursday, 11 August 2016

Police shootings highlight concerns about body cameras




Story highlights

  • Body cams have been proposed as a way to increase transparency and accountability
  • But the cameras are not a panacea, observers say






(CNN)A cop in the nation's third-largest city fatally shot a black teenager in the back after a police chase through Chicago's South Side.
The body camera worn by the Chicago police officer failed to record the shooting of Paul O'Neal. The 18-year-old was suspected of stealing a car that struck the officer's vehicle during the chase late last week, according to police.
    Whether the crash affected the camera's ability to record is under investigation, police said. Investigators are also looking into whether the officer had turned it on. Three officers have been stripped of their police powers. The department's body-camera policy explicitly states what incidents must be filmed.
    "Policies are only as good as the disciplinary procedures," said Harlan Yu, a principal at Upturn, which provides Internet expertise for policymakers on a range of social issues.
    "Yes, Chicago has what appears to be a great policy that lists all the kinds of incidents that police officers need to have their camera on for. But in the shooting of Paul O'Neal it appears that this officer violated the policy. Now the question is what happens to this officer and what disciplinary procedures will there be so that officers will comply with policies in place."
    source:cnntech

    No comments:

    :a   :b   :c   :d   :e   :f   :g   :h   :i   :j   :k   :l   :m   :n   :o   :p   :q   :r   :s   :t Add emoticons to Blogger +

    Post a Comment